WELSH INJUSTICE
The remarks made by Julie James, who is notably pictured occupying much of the chamber, have sparked considerable worry. The suggestion that the Justice system could fall under the authority of the Senedd is unsettling, sending a chill through many. The prospect becomes even more concerning when considering that such a shift would only occur if Wales were to pursue independence, subsequently placing the entire financial burden on Welsh taxpayers. This scenario raises serious apprehensions about both the economic impact and the broader implications for governance and stability in Wales.
It is time to face reality: the notion that Wales would continue to receive the current levels of funding under the Barnett Formula in the event of independence is simply unfounded. Such an assumption ignores the financial and political realities that would inevitably accompany a break from the United Kingdom. The expectation of continued support from Westminster is wishful thinking, akin to believing in fanciful tales. Any move towards independence must be grounded in honest assessment and clear-eyed recognition of the economic consequences for Welsh taxpayers, not comforting illusions.
ITS JUST A QUESTION OF WHEN?
The scale of Starmer’s decline is unprecedented. Soon after the election, his approval rating stood at +11%, buoyed by a sense of hope and renewal. Yet, within a matter of months, this figure collapsed to –38%, marking the steepest post-election drop in modern British history. The reasons for this downfall are manifold: persistent internal party divisions, perceived indecisiveness on pivotal issues, and an apparent disconnect with both traditional Labour supporters and the wider electorate. As public confidence waned, so too did his authority, raising serious questions about how long Starmer can endure the mounting pressures and speculation surrounding his leadership.
Amid these dire approval ratings, rumours have begun swirling within Westminster circles about covert plots to unseat Kier Starmer as Labour leader. Several backbench MPs, reportedly frustrated with the direction of the party and Starmer’s inability to reverse the downward trend, have started informal discussions about possible successors.
While no formal challenge has yet emerged, sources suggest that influential figures are quietly gauging support for a leadership contest, reflecting the growing unease within the party ranks. The pressure is mounting, and questions over Starmer’s future are becoming harder to ignore as Labour faces internal turmoil.
LOKKING OVER THERE WONT SAVE YOU!
Despite speculation about potential EU intervention, it's unlikely that the European Union will come to Starmer's rescue on domestic matters such as ID cards. The EU tends to keep out of the internal political disputes of member and non-member states alike, leaving Starmer to navigate these turbulent waters largely on his own.
A FOOL AND OUR MONEY IS SOON PARTED!
The story of how the French managed to outmanoeuvre Starmer into spending millions is one marked by strategic cunning and diplomatic finesse. Through a series of carefully orchestrated negotiations, French officials presented their proposals in a way that highlighted mutual benefits while subtly concealing the true costs involved. Starmer, keen to secure a deal that would bolster his standing domestically, found himself agreeing to terms that, upon closer inspection, favoured French interests far more than he had anticipated. This episode has since become a cautionary tale in Westminster, illustrating the importance of vigilance and due diligence in international dealings.
THE ROAD TO HOMELESSNESS IS PAVED BY GOOD INTENTIONS
Labour and Plaid Cymru's NATION OF SANCTURY deprives its own people
John Smith
Founder
Oliver Hartman
Customer Service Manager
